As the name suggests, analytical learners depend on logic and analytical skills to understand a particular subject. These learners look for patterns, cause and effect connections etc. They work well with data and finding correlations. They like having reasons for why things happen or need to happen. Think scientist types.

These types of learners favor educational lessons that include peer work or participation. Social/ linguistic learners get two things out of this participation: socializing (which they love) and a better understanding of a subject. These are your social learners who love learning from others, they thrive on participating, group activities and learning from stories and sharing.

These types of learners excel when in contact with nature. A nature learner’s ideal study environment is a calm and relaxing environment. If we had to compare nature learners with another type, it would be tactile learners. The only difference is the nature part of this scenario, as nature learners need to be outside to learn better.

Proposed by Allan Paivio, Dual Coding Theory states individuals process information through two distinct channels: verbal and non-verbal (imagery). By integrating both verbal and visual information, learners can enhance memory and understanding, as it creates multiple pathways for information retrieval. For instance, combining textual explanations with relevant images can facilitate better comprehension.

In face-to-face environments, Dual Coding is often one of the key elements in the design and delivery of learning. For example, it occurs when educators

• use whiteboards, charts, concept maps or props to supplement their verbal explanations
• draw diagrams, write keywords or display images that visually represent the taught content
• actively involve students in verbal discussions around a visual resource
• ask students to perform tasks that involve manipulation of objects or materials while receiving verbal instruction.

Unlike in face-to-face learning, where Dual Coding can occur naturally as a result of the physical environment or spontaneous interactions, in the online learning context it requires careful design and planning. There are additional aspects that educators need to consider, for example:

• Technical constraints: Online learning relies on digital interfaces and Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) platforms, which may impose constraints when it comes to effectively integrating visual representations with verbal content.
• Cognitive load: Implementing Dual Coding strategies can potentially increase cognitive load for students who struggle with the subject matter. This challenge is amplified when they lack immediate feedback from tutors or the opportunity to validate their understanding.
• Accessibility: Ensuring equal access to visual and verbal information can be a complex task in online learning environments. Addressing accessibility issues and providing inclusive learning experiences for all students requires careful attention and consideration.
• Design and development: Online instructors may face challenges in designing visually appealing and academically sound materials that effectively combine visual and verbal elements. They may require additional support or training to use the digital tools to create effective multimedia resources.

Universal Design for Learning is an educational framework aimed at improving and optimizing teaching for all learners. It emphasizes providing multiple means of engagement, representation, and action/expression to accommodate the diverse needs of students. By offering various ways of presenting information and allowing different methods for students to express their knowledge, UDL seeks to create an inclusive learning environment.

• Provide Options for Perception: Based on the premise that learners access information differently, this principle means providing flexible and multiple ways to present information. For example, using PowerPoint as a visual supplement to your lecture.
• Provide Options for Expression: Since learners vary in their abilities to demonstrate their learning in different ways, this principle means providing flexible and multiple ways to allow students to express their knowledge or demonstrate their skills. For example, providing students with an option of writing a final exam or submitting a final assignment. 
• Provide Options for Comprehension: Students are motivated to learn for different reasons and vary in the types of learning activities that keep them engaged. This third principle means providing multiple ways for engaging in course activities. For example, engaging students in both group work activities and individual work, as opposed to engaging students only in individual work.

Howard Gardner, Ph.D., the John H. and Elisabeth A. Hobbs Research Professor of Cognition and Education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, developed the theory of multiple intelligences.

• Verbal-linguistic intelligence: Well-developed verbal skills and sensitivity to the sounds, meanings and rhythms of words
• Logical-mathematical intelligence: Ability to think conceptually and abstractly, and capacity to discern logical and numerical patterns
• Spatial-visual intelligence: Capacity to think in images and pictures, to visualize accurately and abstractly
• Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence: Ability to control one’s body movements and to handle objects skillfully
• Musical intelligences: Ability to produce and appreciate rhythm, pitch and timber
• Interpersonal intelligence: Capacity to detect and respond appropriately to the moods, motivations and desires of others
• Intrapersonal: Capacity to be self-aware and in tune with inner feelings, values, beliefs and thinking processes
• Naturalist intelligence: Ability to recognize and categorize plants, animals and other objects in nature
• Existential intelligence: Sensitivity and capacity to tackle deep questions about human existence such as, “What is the meaning of life? Why do we die? How did we get here?”

Recognizing these intelligences allows educators to tailor instruction to different strengths, thereby facilitating more effective learning experiences.

Rooted in the work of Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky, Constructivist Learning Theory suggests that learners construct knowledge through their experiences and interactions with the world. This approach emphasizes active learning, where students build their understanding by connecting new information to prior knowledge. Educators facilitate this process by providing tools and environments that encourage exploration and discovery.

• Cognitive: Focuses on the idea that learning should be related to the learner’s stage of cognitive development. These methods work to help students in learning new information by connecting it to things they already know, enabling them to make modifications in their existing intelligence to accommodate the new information. Cognitive constructivism comes from the work of Jean Piaget and his research on cognitive development in children.
• Social: Social constructivism focuses on the collaborative nature of learning. Knowledge develops from how people interact with each other, their culture, and society at large. Students rely on others to help create their building blocks, and learning from others helps them construct their own knowledge and reality. Social constructivism comes from Lev Vygotsky, and is closely connected to cognitive constructivism with the added element of societal and peer influence.
• Radical: Radical constructivism is very different from cognitive and social constructivism. It focuses on the idea that learners and the knowledge they construct tell us nothing real, only help us function in our environment. The overall idea is that knowledge is invented, not discovered. The things we bring to the table make it impossible for us to have truth, only interpretations of knowledge.

Developed by David Kolb, Experiential Learning Theory emphasizes learning through experience, proposing a cyclical model involving:

• Concrete Experience: Engaging in a new experience.
• Reflective Observation: Reflecting on the experience.
• Abstract Conceptualization: Formulating concepts based on reflections.
• Active Experimentation: Applying new concepts to different situations.

This model underscores the importance of reflection and experimentation in the learning process, suggesting that knowledge is created through the transformation of experience.

By exploring these alternative learning theories, educators can develop a more comprehensive understanding of the diverse ways in which students learn, enabling them to design instruction that meets the varied needs of their learners.

CAST. (n.d.). The UDL Guidelines. Retrieved from https://udlguidelines.cast.org/

Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232480215_Dual_Coding_Theory_and_Education

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Click here to schedule a 1:1 with a tutor, coach, and or sign up for a workshop.  *If this link does not bring you directly to our platform, please use our direct link to "Academic Support" from any Brightspace course at the top of the navigation bar